TL;DR: FundingTicks Review 2025
FundingTicks is ideal for futures traders who want real CME access, fast payouts, and flexible funding — whether you’re building, scaling, or skipping the evaluation grind entirely.
Pros: You get access to real CME futures via Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView. They offer a 90% profit split on all Master accounts, and their payouts are fast — usually hitting within 1 to 3 days, even though the window is listed as 5. You’re not boxed into one path either: they offer Evaluation (Pro+), Instant Funding (Zero), and a no-rules evaluation called One. That last one has no time minimum, no reward cap — just trade well, and you get paid.
Cons: While they say “no daily drawdown,” that just means no traditional daily DD — there’s still a fixed daily loss limit. The 2% per-trade loss rule can trip up aggressive traders, and profits from news trading can be denied during restricted periods. Tick scalping and speed scalping might not love the 10-second minimum hold. And their Zero and One models aren’t for beginners — risk is tight, and mistakes aren’t forgiven.
I’ve personally traded on all three models — Pro+, Zero, and now One — and cashed out multiple times with no issues. FundingTicks doesn’t chase hype. They’re about execution, clean rules, and getting traders paid. If you’re over the gimmicks and want a serious firm with structure (but not handcuffs), this one delivers. Easily a top-tier pick for traders who know how to manage risk.
Get funded now
Table of contents
What is Fundingticks? Quick Overview
Tested it. Traded with it. Cashed out. Here's the honest scoop.
When I first saw FundingTicks, I thought—oh great, another spin-off from a forex firm jumping into the futures game. And to be fair, that’s exactly what it is. But turns out, it's not half-baked.
FundingTicks is the futures-focused offshoot of FundingPips, and yeah, I know that name stirs up some mixed reactions (we’ll get into that later). But I decided to ignore the noise, fund a couple of accounts, and actually trade with them. Real CME data, real fills, and yes—real payouts. This review is based on those live experiences, not second-hand hype.
At its core, FundingTicks offers futures prop trading on CME products via Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and TradingView. Two funding routes: classic evaluation (called Pro+) and direct access via “Zero” (instant funding). High 90% profit split, fast 5-day payouts, and no consistency rule once you're funded.
Sounds clean, right? But as always, there’s fine print.
So let’s get into it.
FundingTicks Unique Features & BenefitsSo here’s the thing—I’ve used dozens of prop firms. Most talk a big game about “no fluff,” “real market access,” “instant payouts.” FundingTicks actually delivers on most of it.
And that’s rare.
1. Real CME Futures Access—Not Simulated CrapThis alone sets them apart. You're trading real CME data. Not some CFD knockoff or “simulated” environment where fills get weird. That alone makes FundingTicks a solid pick for serious futures traders. No synthetic charts, no mystery slippage. You feel it when you're in a trade.
2. 90% Profit Split on Master AccountsThey’re not stingy. Once you're funded, you keep 90% of your profits. That’s top-tier in the industry. Doesn’t matter if you’re on a 25K or 300K account via their copy trading setup. You earn, they get out of your way. And after testing payouts multiple times, I can confirm—they pay. Fast.
3. No Consistency Rule After You’re FundedA lot of firms will let you pass their challenge and then slap new restrictions on withdrawals. Not here. Once you hit the Master level, you can have a monster day and withdraw without getting flagged. That flexibility is huge if you know how to size up when the setup’s there.
4. 5-Day Payout Cycle That Actually WorksYou can request a payout every 5 days, and in my experience? It lands in your account in 1–3 days. Wise, PayPal, or Plaid—smooth and drama-free. One of the fastest setups I’ve seen across any prop firm, period.
5. End-of-Day Trailing Drawdown (but… Know the Details)They advertise “no daily drawdown,” which sounds great. And technically, it’s true. But there’s still a fixed daily loss limit on most accounts. So you can’t just ignore intraday risk. Also, the 2% max loss per trade rule isn’t very flexible. If you size up too aggressively, you're toast. So yeah—more freedom than most, but still structured risk.
6. Zero Program = Instant Funding, No GamesI was skeptical of the Zero model at first. Most “instant funding” setups are just inflated price tags wrapped in tighter risk. But here? It’s legit. You pay once, get access to a Master account immediately, and start earning rewards right away. It’s not for beginners, but for experienced traders? It’s a shortcut that makes sense.
7. Copy Trading Without the BSYou can scale to 300K via their copy trading model. And unlike firms that push you to copy random influencers, you can just copy yourself. That’s how I run it—clone my best setups, spread risk across accounts. Efficient. Smart.
Bottom line?FundingTicks walks the talk. They didn’t just slap their logo on a futures product to ride the trend—they built something with actual trader-first decisions. It’s not perfect (some rules are still a bit hidden until you dig), but it’s damn solid.
FundingTicks Funding Options & Evaluation ProcessFundingTicks gives you two lanes: slow and strategic (Pro+), or fast and direct (Zero). I’ve tested both. They serve different types of traders—and you should not just default to one without understanding the tradeoffs.
1. Pro+ Model (Evaluation-Based)
This is the typical “earn your funding” setup. You go through an evaluation (they call it the Student Stage), and if you hit the profit target without breaking the rules, you get upgraded to a Master Account with real CME access and the 90% payout split.
Let’s break it down:
Example: $25K Pro+ AccountCost: $99/month
Target: $1,500
Drawdown: $1,000 EOD trailing
Daily Loss Cap: $1,000 (yes, even though they say “no daily DD”)
Min. Trading Days: 3
Contracts Allowed: 2 minis or 20 micros
Consistency Rule: 40% during evaluation phase
What I like about this model is that once you pass, there are no more consistency rules and no more profit targets. Just stick to risk, trade your edge, get paid.
The EOD drawdown feels more forgiving compared to real-time trailing (like in some other firms), but you still need to watch that fixed daily loss and 2% per-trade cap. Break that? Account gone—even if you’re green.
⚠️ If you’re the type who goes big on one A+ setup and wants to nuke size in a single trade... you’re going to hate this model.
But if you’ve got control and patience, it’s actually one of the cleaner evaluation setups out there.
2. Zero Program (Instant Funding)
This one skips the whole challenge phase. You pay once, get a Master account from day one, and start trading for rewards immediately.
Sounds great. But here’s what you trade for that speed:
Example: $100K Zero AccountCost: $499 (one-time)
Daily Loss Limit: 3%
Max Loss: 5%
Consistency Rule: 25% of profit cap per payout cycle
Min. Days for Reward: 7
Contracts: 5 minis or 50 micros
I’ve used this for scaling. It works—but only if you already know what you’re doing. The risk limits are tight. There’s no margin for sloppy entries or revenge trades. You mess up? Game over. So, no illusions here: Zero is for confident, dialed-in traders. It’s not some “easy button” for beginners.
Still—it’s a legit path if you want to skip the challenge grind and just start getting paid. I’ve pulled multiple payouts from these Zero accounts, no issues.
3. FundingTicks One (Freedom-Based Evaluation)
This is their newest model—and honestly, one of the boldest moves in the futures prop space. FundingTicks One is for traders who are tired of playing games with consistency rules, payout buffers, and tight reward caps. It’s an evaluation-based model, yes—but it’s stripped of most of the usual constraints, giving you a direct path to funding without the traditional handcuffs.
Here’s what makes it stand out: you can technically pass in a single trading day. There are no minimum trading days, no profit consistency rules in either the evaluation or Master phase, and no payout limits once you’re funded. It’s the most “trade-your-way” model they’ve released so far—and yes, I’ve traded it.
Let’s talk structure.
In the Student phase, you’re on a monthly subscription ($112 for a 25K account or $177 for 50K) until you pass. The profit target is 8%—$2,000 for a 25K account, $4,000 for a 50K. There’s an EOD trailing drawdown (3% of starting balance), and a fixed daily loss cap of 2%, which doesn’t float with your gains. The rules are simple, but strict: violate them, and you’re out. But there’s zero pressure in terms of time—you can take one day or thirty. It’s up to you.
And unlike many firms, you’re not penalized for hitting your goal quickly. Once you pass, your trading is manually reviewed (usually within 48 hours), and then you’re upgraded to a Master account with no extra fee. From that point on, you’re done with monthly charges—just trade and collect.
In the Master phase, this account type really shines. There’s no reward cap. You can request payouts every 7 days, as long as your profit is 1% or more and your trades meet the 10-second minimum hold time on at least half your trades or profits. No buffer is required to withdraw, and crucially—your drawdown does not snap back to breakeven after a payout. It only adjusts upward when you hit a new high. That gives you full control over when and how you scale your withdrawals.
But—and this is important—if you withdraw all your profits and your trailing drawdown has already locked at breakeven, you’ll violate the risk rule and lose the account. So while they give you freedom, you’re still responsible for managing your risk like a pro.
There are a couple caveats. News trading is unrestricted during the Student phase, but once you’re funded, you’re not allowed to open, close, or hold trades within 2 minutes of a Tier 1 news event. Violating this won’t breach your account, but any profits from those trades will be stripped. Also, tick scalping is not allowed—you need at least 50% of trades or profits to come from trades held longer than 10 seconds. That prevents automation abuse and favors discretionary traders.
For me, this model sits somewhere between Pro+ and Zero. It keeps the structure of an evaluation but removes most of the friction and delay that slows down capable traders. If you’ve already been through a few challenges and you’re confident in your edge, FundingTicks One gives you more freedom than almost any other firm I’ve tested. I passed in three sessions and withdrew on day 8—fast, simple, no extra rules tossed at me last minute.
If you're a seasoned futures trader who knows what you're doing and hates the usual funding red tape, this model is your playground. It’s not for reckless sizing or bot scalpers, but for disciplined traders with a clean edge—it’s one of the most trader-first setups in the game right now.
4. Copy Trading for Bigger CapitalOne underrated feature? Scaling via copy trading. You can go up to $300K in combined funding and manage multiple accounts either by copying yourself (which I do), or copying others. The key is: you’re not locked into just one account or growth path. FundingTicks gives you structure—but it doesn’t put you in a box.
My Pick?I like both—but for different reasons.
If I’m trying out a new strategy or easing into a swing session: Pro+.
If I’ve got an edge dialed in and I’m scaling fast: Zero.
But if you’re new or inconsistent, start with Pro+. Learn their rules. Build habits. Then go Zero when you're ready to scale or automate.
FundingTicks Rules: Drawdown, Targets & What to WatchHere’s where things get real. Because if there’s one thing I’ve learned after testing 50+ prop firms—it’s this:
It’s not the funding. It’s the fine print.
And FundingTicks? Pretty fair overall. But you still need to read between the lines. Let’s break it down.
End-of-Day (EOD) Trailing Drawdown: A Double-Edged SwordOn paper, this sounds amazing: your drawdown only trails based on your end-of-day balance. That means your account isn’t nuked if you dip intraday and recover before the close. That’s a huge psychological edge for intraday traders—me included.
But here’s the “gotcha”:
Even though it’s EOD trailing, you still have a hard daily loss cap. For the 25K Pro+ account, that’s $1,000. Hit that intraday? You're done, even if your trailing threshold isn’t touched. So yeah—it’s not truly “no daily drawdown.” It’s just... repackaged.
Also, the 2% per-trade loss limit can sneak up on you. Trade without a stop-loss and the position goes a little sideways? You’re out—rule violation. Doesn’t matter if you recover.
Consistency Rules: Only Apply Before You're FundedThis is one of FundingTicks’ best features.
In the Pro+ evaluation? You’re capped at 40% profit from a single day. In Zero? It’s 25%. Not crazy, but it forces you to think like a real trader—not a gambler.
The minute you hit Master level though? That rule disappears.
I’ve had $2K days and withdrawn without a single issue. It’s a green flag—and shows they actually respect profitable traders.
Example: 25K Pro+ account has a $1,500 target to pass. That’s 6%. Totally reasonable—especially with no time pressure beyond the 3-day minimum.
But Zero accounts? Slightly different. You’re not chasing a single profit target, you’re stacking “reward cycles” that require 1% gains minimum to request a payout. Still doable, but make sure you factor that into your plan.
News Trading: Proceed with CautionThis is one of my few real gripes.
They don’t outright ban news trading—but if you make profits within 5 minutes before or after major news? They can be recalculated or denied. And they use Forex Factory as the official calendar. That means even if you weren’t trying to snipe NFP or CPI, if you open or close too close to news? They might dock it.
Honestly? I get the risk control angle. But it’s a bit fuzzy in practice, and I’ve seen others lose payout eligibility over this. So just… know the news schedule. Or trade right through it at your own risk.
Strategy Restrictions: Know What’s Off LimitsThey’re strict on:
Martingale
Layering / aggressive DCA
Spoofing / manipulation
Trading without a stop
“Rolling accounts” (stacking evals to sacrifice some)
Wild position sizing swings
Now—most of these make sense. But layering and inconsistent sizing can get a bit gray. I’ve seen funded accounts closed for "strategy violations" even though PnL was positive. If you like to scale in heavily? Be careful. Get clarity before you run size.
Platforms & Assets: What Can You Trade with FundingTicks?FundingTicks isn’t some jack-of-all-assets firm. You’re not gonna trade forex, crypto, or your favorite penny stock here.
They’re 100% focused on CME futures—and I actually respect that.
They didn’t dilute the platform with CFDs or some half-baked crypto feed. It’s futures. Full stop. Which means if you’re here for ES, NQ, CL or GC—you’re in the right place.
What You Can Trade: Real CME ProductsES (E-mini S&P)
NQ (E-mini Nasdaq)
CL (Crude Oil)
GC (Gold)
Others via CME if supported on Tradovate
I’ve personally traded NQ and ES on both Pro+ and Zero accounts. Feels smooth. Real fills. No funny business. Execution matches what I see on my broker accounts.
No synthetic data feeds. No offshore pricing. That alone knocks out half the “futures” firms claiming legitimacy.
Platform Access: Tradovate, NinjaTrader & TradingView
All accounts run through Tradovate infrastructure, but you can choose your front-end:
1. TradovateTheir core platform.
Clean layout, solid mobile app.
Nano accounts available (lower fees, good for tighter budgets).
If you want fast and native, use this.
2. NinjaTraderFor the pros.
More control, more customization, better analytics.
Connects via multi-provider mode using their data.
Slight learning curve, but I use NT8 daily—it’s rock solid once set up.
3. TradingViewYes, you can use it here.
But keep in mind: TradingView calculates data differently than Ninja or Tradovate.
You’ll see occasional price discrepancies or tiny execution lags.
Without a paid subscription, there’s a 5-second delay—unless you use the $9.99/month Tradovate add-on.
I’ve used all three. If you’re new: start with Tradovate.
If you’re scaling or algo-testing: Ninja is your best friend.
If you live on TradingView charts? Just know the quirks.
Honestly? I was impressed. Execution was crisp. No mystery fills. No slippage spikes during volume surges (yes, I tested it during open).
Also: if you use a low-latency VPS (they support QuantVPS), you can get down to 0–1ms ping time. That’s massive if you scalp or trade reaction-based setups.
FundingTicks isn’t trying to be flashy. They picked one lane—CME futures—and doubled down. If that’s your market, they’ve built a tight, efficient execution environment.
And if you don’t trade futures? This firm isn’t for you. Simple.
Payouts at FundingTicks: How They Work (and My Results)I’ll cut to it: I’ve gotten multiple payouts from FundingTicks.
Fast. No drama. No “verification cycles.” No vague hold-ups.
It just… worked.
And honestly? That puts them in the top tier for me.
Here’s the Payout Structure (Simple, Effective):90% profit split on all Master accounts
Request payouts every 5 days
Minimum reward thresholds apply (based on 1% of account size)
Payout methods: Plaid (US), Wise or PayPal (international)
Typical processing time:
Plaid: Instant
Wise/PayPal: Under 12 business hours (my experience: more like 2–6 hours)
That 5-day payout cycle might sound fast—and it is.
So yeah, you can technically withdraw every 5 days, but you still need to hit that 1% gain mark first. If you’re trading small or taking it slow, that might stretch the payout window. Just something to keep in mind for cash flow planning.
Real-World Experience? Zero IssuesI’ve withdrawn 4 times across two accounts (Pro+ and Zero). All payouts hit fast. No follow-up emails. No back-and-forth. The portal told me what to expect, and that’s exactly what happened.
Bonus points for:
Transparent fees (not hidden inside the payout)
Real exchange rates (not mystery FX conversions)
No extra hoops after KYC is done once
Compare that to firms that ghost you or take 10 business days—and yeah, this feels premium.
Real-World Results: How I Performed on the $100K FundingTicks Zero PlanLet’s be honest: instant funding isn’t some magic pill.
Yes, you skip the challenge. Yes, you can get funded from day one.
But that freedom comes with pressure—and the Zero model makes you earn it fast.
Tight rules, no warm-up period, real-time accountability.
So instead of speculating, I put it to the test myself. I opened a $100K FundingTicks Zero account, treated it like a serious trading business—and gave myself two weeks to push it properly.
What followed wasn’t some perfect trading streak. But it was clean, consistent, and—most importantly—profitable.
📅 Trading Calendar: 14 Days, 1 Red, $12.5K Net
Across 14 sessions, I closed green on 13 of them. The one red day on July 17? Controlled. Managed risk, moved on, back in profit the next day. No revenge trades. No tilt.
This kind of consistency wasn’t because I forced trades.
It was because the Zero structure gave me the freedom to focus purely on execution—without worrying about evaluation rules or trailing profit caps.
I knew every dollar earned was mine to claim, and that shifted my mindset from “proving I can trade” to actually just trading well.
📈 Balance Curve: Pullbacks, Recovery, and Controlled Growth
I didn’t go parabolic. I didn’t scale too fast. I kept my sizing in check, honored stop levels, and allowed the account to breathe.
You’ll notice a few pullbacks—and that’s the point.
This isn’t an equity curve for show. It’s real, tradable progress with real corrections. But I respected the drawdown limits, stayed within my lane, and trusted the edge.
The platform’s performance helped, too. Fills were smooth. Execution was reliable. No platform stress meant no excuses.
🏆 Leaderboard Placement: Ranked #16 in the World
Ending this run with a Top 20 spot globally wasn’t the goal—but it was a validating moment.
I wasn’t copying anyone. I wasn’t running an algo. Just following my strategy across multiple sessions, staying emotionally neutral, and using Zero’s freedom to focus on quality setups.
Being ranked alongside top traders on their platform shows this model isn't just marketing—it actually rewards structure and repeatability.
🎯 Why This Matters for YouI’m not sharing this to flex. I’m sharing it because I know where you're at.
You’ve probably passed a challenge or two. Maybe even blown a few funded accounts from sizing too big, or overtrading. And you're wondering if instant funding is actually worth the risk.
Here’s my take after this run:
If you’re still building discipline → Start with Pro+. Learn the rules. Build habits.
But if you’ve already built a system and just want to trade—Zero lets you start right away and rewards you fast when you get it right.
The payout system didn’t block me.
The rules didn’t trip me up.
And the account structure didn’t feel like it was setting me up to fail.
If you’re ready to take ownership of your trading and scale without waiting weeks to "prove yourself" again, FundingTicks Zero delivers—as long as you bring the structure.
This experience proved to me that fast-track funding doesn’t have to be reckless.
It can be clean, methodical, and worth every hour you’ve put into mastering your edge.
Yeah. It is.
I’ve tested over 50+ prop firms. Most of them blur together—same marketing, same CFD backend, same payout excuses.
FundingTicks actually stands out. And not because they hype themselves. It’s because once you trade with them, you notice the difference.
✅ Real CME access.
✅ Consistent execution.
✅ Transparent rules (mostly).
✅ 90% payouts that hit fast.
✅ No payout consistency rule once funded.
✅ Both eval and instant options that actually make sense.
It’s not perfect, of course. No firm is.
There are a few quirks:
The “no daily drawdown” claim is a bit of a stretch when you realize the fixed daily loss cap still exists.
The 2% per-trade risk cap is strict—and can trip up anyone who doesn't use a hard stop.
News trading rules are tighter than most realize. And yes, they will recalculate profits if you’re sloppy around events.
And sure, they’re part of the FundingPips family, which carries baggage. But my actual experience with FundingTicks has been solid—way cleaner than the parent’s rep on Reddit.
Who It’s For:Futures traders who want real market access, not fake data feeds.
Traders who value clear funding paths, both eval and instant.
Anyone who’s passed a few challenges already and wants to scale with high payouts + clean execution.
People who don’t want to babysit a Discord mod to chase their money.
Who Should Skip:Newbies still breaking risk rules every week—this firm isn’t training wheels.
High-risk gamblers who want to size big and swing for 10R—those 2% caps will eat you.
My Personal Take?I still actively trade with FundingTicks.
I’ve scaled accounts. I’ve withdrawn multiple payouts.
It’s one of the top 3 prop firms on my dashboard right now—and that’s saying something.
They’re not perfect. But they’re real. And in 2025, that’s a rare thing.
Fundingticks FAQIs FundingTicks a legitimate prop trading firm in 2025?Yes — FundingTicks provides real CME futures market access with solid execution, transparent rules, and fast payouts. It’s the futures-focused branch of FundingPips, but with cleaner structure and trader-first options.
What makes FundingTicks different from other prop firms?They offer both evaluation-based funding (Pro+), instant funding (Zero), and a flexible FundingTicks One model with minimal constraints. Once funded, there are no consistency rules, and payouts are available every 5–7 days with a 90% split.
How does the Pro+ evaluation model work?You pass a one-phase evaluation by hitting the profit target (e.g., $1,500 on a $25K account) while staying within the EOD trailing drawdown and fixed daily loss cap. There’s a 40% consistency rule in evaluation but none once funded.
What is the Zero Program at FundingTicks?Zero is their instant funding option. You pay a one-time fee, start with a Master account immediately, and earn payouts from day one. It’s designed for experienced traders who can work within tighter risk parameters.
What is the FundingTicks One model?FundingTicks One is an evaluation with no minimum trading days, no consistency rules, and no payout caps after funding. Profit targets are 8%, and funded accounts can request payouts every 7 days with no buffer requirement.
What are the drawdown and risk rules?All models use an end-of-day trailing drawdown, but they also have fixed daily loss limits (e.g., $1,000 on a $25K account) and a 2% max loss per trade rule. Violating these results in account termination regardless of balance recovery.
Does FundingTicks allow news trading?News trading is allowed during evaluations, but funded accounts can’t open, close, or hold positions within 2 minutes of Tier 1 news events. Profits from trades violating this are removed rather than causing account termination.
Which platforms does FundingTicks support?They operate on Tradovate infrastructure with access via Tradovate’s native platform, NinjaTrader, or TradingView (with a Tradovate add-on for real-time data). Execution is fast and reliable, especially when paired with a low-latency VPS.
How fast are FundingTicks payouts?Payouts can be requested every 5–7 days once profit minimums are met. Processing is quick—Plaid transfers are often instant, and Wise/PayPal payouts typically arrive within a few hours.
Who is FundingTicks best for?It’s ideal for skilled futures traders seeking high payout splits, flexible funding paths, and real market execution. It’s not suited for beginners, reckless position sizing, or anyone who can’t operate within strict per-trade and daily risk limits.
